How does large news media shape how we interpret data?

In a recent report conducted and released by the FBI, according to their data, between 2019 and 2020 the United States experienced the greatest increase in violent crime rates in a single year span since 2015 to 2016. In this article from The New York Times, the author continued to reiterate that this was the sharpest increase from the 1990s, while in fact 2019-2020 only had less than one point more than the increase between 2015 and 2016 - this is violent crimes overall, not just murders. The Twitter thread included below outlines the incredible amount of journalistic malfeasance that occurred in this article. Even if I had not found this article via that Twitter thread I would still believe that this article should not have been published the way it was. 

The first thing I noticed was how sources cited in the beginning of the article continuously held that there was not a list of factors to pinpoint that led to the increase but then as you keep reading another source spouts of a list of reasons for the increase. And within this list, they all stem from anti-police rhetoric and attitudes. This is a dangerous and speculative and does little other than place ideas in the readers minds. Another aspect of the article that stuck out to me was how they framed the "sharp increase". If you manipulate the timeline of the graph (which is very easy to do on the FBI's website), you can see that crime is SO LOW compared to the 1990s. The Times article made it seem like crime and murders had had such an increase, and while they did not omit the level of crime today compared to the 90s, they buried that information in random one-liners beside "trusted sources" bashing reforms. 

Overall, this article is a dumpster fire of contradictory information and if someone does not critically read the article and then look at the data themselves, then they can very well believe the interpretation of the data set out by the Times. Headlines and renowned news sources shape the way readers interpret and understand data and it is dangerous and harmful to portray facts in such a way.

Alex Karakatsanis Twitter Thread

Scott Hechinger Twitter Thread


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There is Still Hope for Local News Outlets

Has influencing public policy has been made easier by social media?